Something's Awry…

  • Archive
  • RSS
  • Ask me anything

iTunes Match

So I took the plunge this week and purchased iTunes Match. After using it for a bit, I thought I’d make a quick post about it.

Background

iTunes Match is a cloud based music system built into iTunes and iOS devices that allow you to upload your music to iTunes servers and lets you download it to up to 10 iOS and OS X devices. It’s primarily a music storage service, rather than a streaming service like Spotify Offsite Link as when you listen to the song on an iOS device, it downloads the music to the device, whilst playing it as it downloads (streaming would then wipe it from the device to clear space, this doesn’t). It also only lets you access music you already own, not letting you stream different music from a catalogue, so it’s useful for those with an already large library. In the UK, the services costs £21.99 a year and you get unlimited use over that period. Note, iTunes automatically sets itself up as recurring, yearly, payment.

How it works

As mentioned above, it only works with music you already own and have in your iTunes library. If you don’t use iTunes, iTunes Match isn’t for you. When you sign up, iTunes match analyses your library and matches all the songs you own to those in iTunes database. These songs are then instantly “uploaded” to your account (in theory, they’re already in the cloud, iTunes just let your AppleID access them). Those tracks that aren’t in the iTunes library (I have some obscure Russian rock in my collection for example…), iTunes then uploads them to it’s servers to allow you download them to your other devices.

Overall, the system is fairly quick – I did have to leave it going over night but then with 7,532 songs to analyse, it’ll take a while. iTunes managed to find ~5,000 of my songs in it’s database so I did have to upload 2,000 but it seemed to go quite quickly and when I woke, it was all complete. Enabling Match on my iPad was a simple case of enabling it in the Settings > Music. It then deletes all music off the device and lets you see all the stored music in the cloud (though you can set the device to only display local songs if you don’t want to browse your entire library all the time).

Advantages

I must admit, the main reason for me upgrading to Match was not the fact I could have instant access to my music wherever I was (though it’s nice to see the iPad being even less reliant on syncing with a PC) but the fact I now have a cloud backup of my music. If I delete it off my hard drive or I have a hard drive failure, I load up iTunes and redownload. Boom. Simple. And for £22 a year (for upto 25,000 non iTunes songs!) It sort of blows the cloud backup services out of the water (in terms of pricing and ease of use.) Considering I was only paying for backup space to backup my music, it no longer makes sense for me to keep paying for a cloud backup solution for my media files.

Another benefit it that some of music is 192kbps MP3 (or less) files. iTunes lets you download the better sounding 256kbps versions to replace them. Macworld have a fantastic guide on how to accomplish that here Offsite Link. It may take me some time though as iTunes finds over 4,000 songs under 256kbps! This does replace your MP3 files with Apple .aac files. However, these are DRM free and should play in most desktop players and non Apple portable music players, even if you decide to not continue with iTunes match next year.

Disadvantages

Unfortunately, there are some disadvantages to iTunes Match – the big one I’ve found is that some songs wont upload because they’re under 96kbps which is what iTunes limit to be uploaded to it’s servers. I think the most annoying thing about this is that some albums I have are VBR encodings and one or two tracks won’t upload from that album. However, according to my install, I have 35 songs that either aren’t eligible or there are errors uploading to iCloud in some way (it turns out the main reason for this was that the files were no longer on my computer but iTunes hadn’t detected them as missing). I found this by creating a smart playlist using the criteria in the image below.

That’s less than 1% of my songs so I must admit, I’m pretty impressed overall. And to be fair, most of the songs that are below the threshold bitrate are songs I’ve ripped from Youtube videos (or acquired from disreputable means, which thanks to an eMusic Offsite Link subscription, no longer occurs) in the past so it’s a good way for me to either delete them or go back and purchase the songs.

For those that use non Apple phones or tablets, you’re out of luck – you can’t use iCloud on it (though if you use iTunes on different computers, you can use it in iTunes). This obviously restricts the users to those of Apple’s products but this is a very much a business move that Apple are used to taking so should come as no surprise.

Overall

Overall, the iTunes Match experience is pretty damn good. The ease at which it searches through your library and finds the tracks you already have and then matches these to the iTunes catalogue is amazing. As I said, the amount of songs I have which were picked up was staggering – a 99.5% success rate. By any stretch of the imagination, that’s a resounding success.

I know it’s not marketed as a music backup service (as Apple reserve the right to remove any items from the iTunes store at any time), but it it makes a really cheap service that’ll allow you to redownload your music, should a disaster occur and your hard drive die/wiped/eaten.

If you are fully entrenched in the Apple eco system (like I am), then the £22 for the year is an easy choice to make – it’s reduced my offsite backup cost by 50% this year as I no longer have to spend so much on space for my music collection – I’m trusting it to Apple’s servers and my ability to store it on a portable drive at work. The ability to change the tracks on my iPad without being near my PC is also a good point (as you can now delete tracks from iPod and iPads in iOS 5). £22 for these benefits, to me is a price worth paying. And don’t forget, I can update those old sounding tracks upto the newer, better 256kbps tracks. Which is worth £22 alone!

    • #iTunes
    • #os x
    • #windows
    • #apple
    • #backup
    • #online storage
    • #music
  • 4 months ago
  • 8
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

Spideroak Vs Dropbox

Intro

Ok, so I’ve been a fan of online backup now for probably over a year or so. I never used to like the idea of my data being stored off-site but then after reading various backup methodologies, I realised I needed an offsite backup solution to be truly safe from data loss.

So I tried the various different options at the time and basically played around with two options, Spideroak and Dropbox. To make it clear, I bought paid for subscription to each over this testing to make sure I was getting the full service.

I’ve now come to the conclusion on each now I think.


Dropbox

Dropbox is a fantastic service. Easy to use, simple and clean. However, whilst it says that it’s data is private, it’s only a very small note in the terms and conditions. And it’s track record for privacy isn’t untarnished.

It’s connivence cant be denied. Simply drop a file in and wait for it to upload and then access on any device you own that’s connect to Dropbox. Pretty sweet.

The main downsides are that you need to mess about moving folders and files into the Dropbox folder to get them to sync (or use Symlinks, something that might be over and above that average users want to learn about). Whilst Dropbox offers versioning of files for 30 days, you cant get an extension to this unless you buy the Packrat extension which adds to the monthly charge.

Overall, the simplest service for syncing and sharing data is great but potential privacy issues are worrying – especially to myself where I want to sync data between my Mac’s and some of that data is personal data such as scans of drivers license, bank statements etc. However, Dropbox support built into web apps, mobile apps and desktop apps allowing easy syncing of non personal data, such as code snippets in Codebox and settings such as Alfred app mean that Dropbox is a great tool.


Spideroak

Spideroak’s main draw is privacy. It’s screams it at you from the very beginning. It’s webpage mentions 2 factor authentication (should you want it), they make sure you know that they don’t store your password. it’s quite clear from the start that Spideroak’s privacy features are a top priority.

Like Dropbox, you can add whatever you want to Spideroak but unlike Dropbox, it can stay where it is on the disk drive – you open up the software and select what you want to backup. Syncing is done via sync option which is a bit more in depth than Dropbox which can be a pain for new users. However, it’s not so hard once you figure it out. it does mean you can select only the folders you want to sync between machines which is quite good (in more detail at least than Dropbox’s selective sync features).

Spideroak offers a better value for money in terms of storage. 100GB of storage is $10 a month ($5 if you’re a student) compared to Dropbox’s $10 for 50GB. Unlike Dropbox, Spideroak offer de-duplication. Meaning if you upload the same file on one computer linked to Spideroak and then upload it on another, upload will be fairly instant (as it’s already on the server – which Dropbox do as well) – however, Spideroak only count it once towards space used on your account.

However, after using for a while, the cracks have started to appear in the sync feature. In the event of a clash of updated files, Dropbox will create a conflicted copy – Spideroak silently updates both files to the newest version and keeps the previous version. Not entirely good to see as often you wont notice. And it seems that sometimes sync actions seem to fail for no reason – good reason that I found today was that I access a file yesterday, made a change and saved. Spideroak uploaded it. I went to access it today and the changes from yesterday hadn’t synced across (sync and backup set to instant and the laptop was on all day yesterday to allow sync) – Spideroak even showed in the software that the laptop version had uploaded yesterday but no reason was given why it hadn’t downloaded to the Macbook.

The uptime of Spideroak is lacking slightly behind Dropbox as well. It’s been quite often that I’ve found that Spideroak is having trouble uploading whilst Dropbox is having no issues.


Conclusions

Overall, both bits of software are great. However, both are lacking. Dropbox is lacking privacy and Spideroak is missing out on sync functions that work all the time and desktop notifications. It’s a shame.

I feel that Spideroak is an offsite storage medium, rather than a sync tool. It compares fairly well to other services like Crashplan+ as you can add unlimited devices without paying extra. Dropbox is unrivalled by Spideroak as a syncing program – it’s ability to sync documents easily, quickly and transparently is great -it’s greatest flaw however is the privacy issue.

At the end of the day, you pay your money and take you’re choice. For me, it looks like a potential return to the hard drive for syncing private data, however, should I want to download a file – I know the Spideroak will have the latest version on it’s website to download securely.

Of course, there’s always the option of running my own SSH server…

    • #online storage
    • #backup
    • #dropbox
    • #spideroak
    • #sync
    • #mac
    • #apple
    • #windows
  • 8 months ago
  • 47
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

Spideroak

Spideroak backup service - Like Dropbox but better. Considering trying it - 2GB free and if you click my link and sign up, you and me will get an extra 1GB free. :)

    • #spideroak
    • #dropbox
    • #backup
    • #online backup
    • #sync
    • #software
  • 1 year ago
  • 6
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

About

Geek, Cyclist, Apple Fan, Redditor

Pages

  • Publications

Me, Elsewhere

  • @_drezha on Twitter
  • Facebook Profile
  • drezha on Youtube
  • drezha_ on Last.fm
  • drezha on github

Twitter

loading tweets…

  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • Ask me anything
  • Mobile

Effector Theme by Carlo Franco.

Powered by Tumblr